<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Foreign Keys Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clay.lenharts.net/blog/2007/11/17/are-foreign-keys-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clay.lenharts.net/blog/2007/11/17/are-foreign-keys-bad/</link>
	<description>A blog on .Net and SQL Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajiv Narula</title>
		<link>http://clay.lenharts.net/blog/2007/11/17/are-foreign-keys-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-15330</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Narula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clay.lenharts.net/blog/?p=3#comment-15330</guid>
		<description>Interesting post...

Maybe you already know about this...
eBay has developed an amazing architecture- where they have no foreign keys, no transactions.
Yes, They work on auto commit

Google on ebay architecture to read more on this

Foreign keys and transactions  - according to them-  are major impediments on high scalable solutions.

Anyways the fact an application like eBay has been able to pull it off- warrants credit
.
Cheers !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe you already know about this&#8230;<br />
eBay has developed an amazing architecture- where they have no foreign keys, no transactions.<br />
Yes, They work on auto commit</p>
<p>Google on ebay architecture to read more on this</p>
<p>Foreign keys and transactions  &#8211; according to them-  are major impediments on high scalable solutions.</p>
<p>Anyways the fact an application like eBay has been able to pull it off- warrants credit<br />
.<br />
Cheers !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Simpson</title>
		<link>http://clay.lenharts.net/blog/2007/11/17/are-foreign-keys-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clay.lenharts.net/blog/?p=3#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Excellent post Clay!  In defense of my proposing removing foreign key constraints, I did state that &quot;To date I have not found it necessary to go to this extreme.&quot;  Generally I prefer the approach Clay described at the end of his post.  But I thought this was a good topic of discussion - it&#039;s not something many developers consider in much detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Clay!  In defense of my proposing removing foreign key constraints, I did state that &#8220;To date I have not found it necessary to go to this extreme.&#8221;  Generally I prefer the approach Clay described at the end of his post.  But I thought this was a good topic of discussion &#8211; it&#8217;s not something many developers consider in much detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

